🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in an organized professional network test this week after viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they called "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."