🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities will be slashed by more than half, after a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to submit the future of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to establish a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities frequently devoted considerable time building community backing and pushing their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required councils that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to measures designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it wants to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – most urban centers required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to establish other types of electoral districts – including rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards indicated the administration was targeting Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that chose to keep their wards.